That statement is true
The commander's name is Carleton. By that point, the british empire already started to made effort to abolish slavery before united states. So Carleton believed that returning the escaped slaves to Washington would be dishonorable.
Washington keep pushing him for several years for the return of the slaves until he eventually gave up and asked for compensation instead.
I think you forgot to give the options along with the question. i am answering the question based on my research and knowledge. The European nations were not satisfied with establishing free trade with Africa and Asia during the era of imperialism because <span>European nations wanted monopoly control of markets and resources.</span>
Answer:
I’m gonna say C...
Explanation:
I don’t know tho if I’m wrong I’m so srry for wasting your points and time.
HEY PLS DON'T JOIN THE ZOOM CALL OF A PERSON WHO'S ID IS 825 338 1513 (I'M NOT SAYING THE PASSWORD) HE IS A CHILD PREDATOR AND A PERV. HE HAS LOTS OF ACCOUNTS ON BRAINLY BUT HIS ZOOM NAME IS MYSTERIOUS MEN.. HE ASKS FOR GIRLS TO SHOW THEIR BODIES AND -------- PLEASE REPORT HIM IF YOU SEE A QUESTION LIKE THAT. WE NEED TO TAKE HIM DOWN!!! PLS COPY AND PASTE THIS TO OTHER COMMENT SECTIONS!!
-Infreeman
this a warning by infreeman...so be aware and stay safe!^^
For the answer to the question above, are you referring to colonial period?
because during the colonial period, European women in America remained entitled to the legal protections provided by imperial authorities, even when they occupied unfree statuses, such as indentured servitude. For instance, when masters or mistresses mistreated their indentured servant women physically violated the terms of their labor contracts, the servants had a right to complain at the local court for redress; in some jurisdictions, their pleas met with remedies from the bench. Nevertheless, patriarchal models of authority prevailed, and despite their access to the courts, indentured women remained restricted by a series of laws that gave their masters extensive powers over them. They could not marry or travel while under contract, and if they ran away, became pregnant, or challenged their masters, they would be penalized with extra terms of service. While the law in Virginia, for instance, penalized masters who impregnated their servant women by freeing the latter, at the same time the statute averred that such women might be unfairly “induced to lay all their illegitimate to their masters” in order to gain their freedom. The statutory language is clearly indicative of class-based notions of dissolute sexuality. Indeed, the statutes enacted across imperial North America, like those iterated above, were devoted to creating and enforcing differences among women on the basis of not only race but class as well.
