Answer:
need more information in your question in order to answer this ...
Explanation:
Answer:
What arguments could be made for removing the dictator?
Arguments for removing the dictator are: allowing the country to establish a democracy. Helping out or improving the situation of those demographic groups that were oppressed by the dictator. Another argument is simply punishing the dictator for his crimes.
What arguments could be made for keeping the dictator in power?
The main argument for keeping the dictator is to ensure the stability of the country, even if such stability is unfair at many times, and comes along with the oppresion of certain social and political groups.
Another argument is simply to prevent the country from getting worse.
A final argument is pragmatic: keeping the dictator in power might serve everyone's interests better. Democratic countries have frequently established ties with authoritarian governments.
thst the french would aid them but the french helped the other side instead
Answer:
Migrants eventually induce social, economic, and political problems in receiving countries, including
1) increases in the population, with adverse effects on existing social institutions;
2) increases in demand for goods and services;
3) displacement of nationals from occupations in the countryside and in the cities;
4) increases in the size of the informal sector of the national economy;
5) deterioration in the salary structures of the informal, rural, and urban sectors of the economy;
6) transculturation;
7) occasional loss of customs and traditions by the local population; and
8) the introduction of diseases and social problems. The receiving countries do benefit from the infusion of skills.
