Answer: $0.79.
Explanation:
Given that,
Tendered bill = $5
Bill charged = $4.21
Therefore,
The change due is calculated by subtracting bill charged from tendered bill.
Change due = Tendered bill - Bill charged
= $5 - $4.21
= $0.79
Hence, change in dollars would be $0.79.
Answer:
B) She has to share all of the profits with the partner.
Explanation:
A partnership is a business owned by two or more parties while a sole proprietorship is owned by one person. In the former, decisions are made jointly and the process might take long since all partners must consent to it. Another disadvantage is that all profits are shared between or among all partners unlike a sole proprietorship where the owner takes all the profits.
Answer:
a) The federal funds rate has a higher interest rate than the discount rate to encourage borrowing
Explanation:
The Feds fund rate is the rate at which banks borrow from each other usually overnight, while the discount rate is the interest rate charged by the Fed to commercial banks for borrowing directly from the Fed.
These borrowings help the commercial banks meet up their liquidity requirements.
The discount rate is higher than the Fed funds rate. This is to encourage banks to borrow from each other instead of borrowing directly from the Federal Reserve.
The Fed fund rate also tends to affect the prime lending rate (rate at which banks lend money to their clients).
So the statement - The federal funds rate has a higher interest rate than the discount rate to encourage borrowing. Is not correct
Since the coffee beans arrived on September 2 instead of on
September 1, LaTisha's best defense would be breach of a legally binding
contract by Marco. Marco failed without, any legal excuse, to deliver the
products as promised. Marco violated the legal agreement between the two
parties since he did not perform his obligation.
Answer:
consequential damages cover only reasonable foreseeable losses.
Explanation:
- The contract limits the resulting loss to lost profits from the use of the goods. The limit is not necessarily unconscious because lost profits are not necessarily significant and can be considered as direct or indirect losses.
- the contract may apply to both the lease and the sale and excluding some from the contract simply because it is a commercial loss makes no sense.
- so limit is not necessarily unconscionable because consequential damages cover only reasonable foreseeable losses.
