Answer:
The beaches I visited in Aruba had the same clear turquoise water that I had seen in the brochures.
Explanation:
<u>A relative clause, or adjective clause, is a group words that has a subject and a verb. It functions like an adjective would, offering information about a noun in the sentence. This type of clause starts with a relative pronoun or a relative adverb (who, whom, that, which, when, etc.)</u>
When we have two sentences that mention the same thing or person, we can often change one of the sentences into a relative clause. To do so, we add the relative pronoun and drop anything that is repetitive. Let's do that to the sentences that were provided in the question:
1. The beaches I visited in Aruba had clear turquoise water.
2. I'd seen the same clear turquoise water in the brochures.
Combined sentence: The beaches I visited in Aruba had <u>the same clear turquoise water</u> that I had seen in the brochures.
We did not need to repeat "clear turquoise water." We combined the sentences by transforming sentence 2 into a relative clause.
Answer:
the last one.
Explanation:
In my mind, the answer is the last one.
Stereotypical characters was a nightmare. It encouraged the wrong type of behavior. It presented the Fonz as a standard of behavior for both girls and boys which was unrealistic.
Commercialism is a criticism. It means that we are in competition with our neighbors to see who has the largest yacht. That's not a very good competition.
Nobody lived like the Fonz.
Though it might not be a virtue now, it certainly is not a bad thing to portray. The answer should be the last one.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Seems logical to me, in a democracy the public decides but obviously we can't run every single decision by every single inhabitant. That's why we choose who does, therefor voting is vital
Answer:
I will if it's not like a long epic poem or something lol
Explanation:
Answer:Solve the equation d + 3n = 1, for n
Explanation: