Answer:
I hope this helps you and you have an amazing day the answer
Width=12
Length=30
Step-by-step explanation:
L=2W+6
is
P=2L+2W
84=2(2W+6)+2W
84=4W+12+2W
84=6W+12
6W=84-12
6W=72
W=72/6
W=12 ans. for the width.
L=2*12+6=24+6=30 ans. for the length.
Proof:
84=2*30+2*12
84=60+24
84=84
Answer:
x = 14
Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:
Hey there!
By looking at the figure, the given "2x" and "6x + 28" are co-interior angle.
So,
2x + 6x + 28 = 180°. ( sum of co-interior angle is 180°)
8x + 28°=180°
8x = 180° - 28°
8x = 152°

X = 19°
<u>There</u><u>fore</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>X </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u>1</u><u>9</u><u>°</u><u>.</u>
<em><u>Hope</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>it</u></em><em><u> helps</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
Answer:
2x + 4y = 16.
Step-by-step explanation:
14x - 7y = 8
Convert to slope-intercept form:
-7y = -14x + 8
y = 2x - 8/7
The slope is 2 so the line perpendicular to it has a slope of -1/2, so we have:
y = 1/2x + c
This line passes through the point (-2, 5) so:
5 = -1/2* (-2) + c
5 = 1 + c
c = 5 - 1 = 4
So our equation is y = -1/2x + 4.
Convert to standard from
4y = -2x + 16
2x + 4y = 16.
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ > 54.4.
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Previous concepts
A hypothesis is defined as "a speculation or theory based on insufficient evidence that lends itself to further testing and experimentation. With further testing, a hypothesis can usually be proven true or false".
The null hypothesis is defined as "a hypothesis that says there is no statistical significance between the two variables in the hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that the researcher is trying to disprove".
The alternative hypothesis is "just the inverse, or opposite, of the null hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that researcher is trying to prove".
2) Solution to the problem
On this case we want to test is
and the system of hypothesi on this case are:
Null Hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis:
On this case is our decision is FAILS to reject the null hypothesis then we can conclude that we don't have enough evidence to support the claim at the significance level provided. So the correct conclusion would be:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ > 54.4.