<u>Which method was more effective in containment? Why?</u>
The Marshall Plan was an example of using financial resources to stop the spread of communism.
Approved by Henry Truman in 1943, the Marshall Plan was a far more effective method in containment because of the following reasons:
- Firstly, it was a subtle method to contain the spread of communism through the USSR disguised as a "plan" to help Western Europe and its decreased economy through loans.
- Secondly, it was a peaceful method that didn't result in devastation as the Korean War.
- Thirdly, it was perceived as a "miracle" and the US gained recognition for their efforts, as well as increasing their own economy.
- Furthermore, through the US' humanitarian efforts it tried to implicitly change the beliefs of the Western European people towards a non-communist political system, for which the Marshall Plan succeeded in the subsequent years.
Congress wanted to eliminate the Black Codes, while Johnson did not
He noticed everything was connected to mathematics in the natural world. I hope this helps! :)
Answer: Cicero
Explanation: Marcus Tullius <em>Cicero</em> was one of the greatest Roman orators and possibly the greatest. He was also a successful politician, lawyer and philosopher. It is believed that his influence on the Latin language is immeasurable, because he also contributed as a prose stylist, known for exceptional and convincing speeches. He had so much influence on the speech and the history of prose, that until the 19th century was a challenge, that almost all the prose work in that field was in fact a reaction to his own model.
<span>Florence was very important during the Renaissance because it was a major center of Renaissance culture.</span>
