Due to the flaws on Electoral College, there will always be a possibility that the winner of the popular vote may not win the presidency. This has already occurred four times and the most recent in 2000. This is because of the winner take all factor which means that any votes won by the loser of the popular vote are not replicated in the electoral vote. Like in 2008, Barack Obama won only in the 51 percent of the popular vote in Ohio but still, he won all of Ohio's electoral votes even though most of the Ohioans voted for John McCain.
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The significance of having three branches of government is tremendous and can't be overemphasized. Some of the significance includes:
1. It makes the government effective and efficient.
2. Having three branches of government protects the rights of the citizens
3. It prevents arbitrary use of power by the government
Are there advantages if the responsibility to govern is shouldered only by one branch?
No there are no advantages. If any branch of government turned has all the power of the executive, judiciary, and legislative there will eventually be an arbitrary use of power in the long run, and this will affect the citizens and that society at large. This has been proven in human history in the past in the case of the dictator and absolute monarchy.
<span>They were in response to the tea dumped into Boston Harbor (aka the Boston Tea Party.)</span>
Answer:
I believe it's choice B
Explanation:
Reason for this is because it was thought a lot of the statues were carved to replicate or be a symbol of political leaders and to have similar features to many of the past rulers.
I hope this helped :D
I'm gonna go with B; A, C, B.
Alexander the Great ruled from 331 - 323 BC, the Han Dynasty started in 206 BC and ended in 220 AD, and finally the Mongol empire began in 1206 AD and ended in 1368 AD.
Hope this helps!
