Answer:
This is incomplete, I need the options to be able to answer this question
Answer:
$6,225.08
Explanation:
The computation of the future value of these cash flows in year 4 is shown below:
= Year 1 cash flow × (1 + interest rate)^year + Year 2 cash flow × (1 + interest rate)^year + Year 3 cash flow × (1 + interest rate)^year + Year 4 cash flow × (1 + interest rate)^year
= $950 × 1.08^3 + $1,180 × 1.08^2 + $1,400 × 1.08^1 + $2,140
= $950 × 1.259712 + $1,180 × 1.1664 + $1,400 × 1.08 + $2,140
= $1,196.7264 + $1,376.352 + $1,512 + $2,140
= $6,225.08
Considering the situation described above, when Global Petroleum negotiated a deal with Saudi Arabia, this is an example of <u>Bartering</u>.
<h3>What is a Bartering?</h3>
Bartering is a transaction agreement whereby both parties agree to pay with goods or services without using money.
Therefore, in this situation, when Global Petroleum negotiated with Saudi Arabia to receive oil as partial payment over 20 years. This is an example of <u>Bartering</u>.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is <u>Bartering</u>.
Learn more about <u>Bartering</u> here: brainly.com/question/1462751
Answer:
Microsoft was doing good till 1990's because there was no competition at that time and they were the only operation system known, but when internet market was getting other competitors Microsoft's risk increased they couldn't compete with them.
Explanation:
Systematic beta reflects the risk which is present in the market and difficult to avoid.
- Microsoft was doing great when and the reason they got on top was because there was no competitor so they weren't at risk.
- <em>But</em> since the technological industry is enhancing Microsoft didn't adapt to change and continued with their old strategy which led them at this condition as there risk is increasing they are highly volatile to the market.
Answer:
Please find the complete question in the attached file.
Explanation:
