The tragedy of the commons occurs where property rights are lacking.
In economics, the tragedy of the commons is the situation in which individual users, who have free access to resources, are not bound by shared social structures or rules. officially govern access and use, acting independently in their own interest and contrary to general principles. common interests of all users, causing resource depletion due to their uncoordinated actions.
The concept originated in an essay written in 1833 by the British economist William Forster Lloyd, who used a hypothetical example of the impact of unregulated grazing on the region. common land in Great Britain and Ireland.
To know more about tragedy of the commons here-
brainly.com/question/29221557
#SPJ4
Answer:
its the third one..........
Explanation:
Answer:
c. the structure of a job makes it difficult for certain groups of individuals to succeed.
Explanation:
Insitutional discrimination is the type whereby an individual passes through as a result of institution like the school, church, prison e.t.c. This discrimination is passed across by the institutional body.
For example, in a situation whereby a school refuses to admit a bright black individual because of their immaginary law but goes ahead to admit someone that has low score just because, he or she is not black can be said to be institutional discrimination.
Answer:
Third party.
Explanation:
A court refers to an enclosed space such as a hall or chamber where legal practitioners (judges, lawyers or attorneys and a jury) converge to hold judicial proceedings.
There are different types of courts and these includes;
I. Trial court.
II. Circuit court.
III. Appeal court.
IV. Supreme court.
A trial court refers to a court of original jurisdiction and as such it is the court where issues of fact, evidence, laws, and testimony for a litigation are first received, considered and decided.
Additionally, the citizen jury are legally empowered by law to carry out an investigation with respect to a potential criminal case, engage in legal proceedings and determine whether or not an evidence is quite sufficient to warrant trial in a court of competent jurisdiction.
Hence, in the trial court system, an impartial third party, such as a judge or jury, has the responsibility of choosing between the two versions of the facts. Thus, grand jury are legally empowered by law to carry out an investigation with respect to a potential criminal case, engage in legal proceedings and determine whether or not an evidence is quite sufficient to warrant trial in a court of competent jurisdiction.
The answer is Cognitive Learning Theory. This
theory enlightens why the brain is the most unbelievable system of information dispensation
and analysis in the body as we study things. This theory can be further talked
about when we divide it into two detailed theories, these are the Social Cognitive Theory
and the Cognitive Behavioral Theory.
