Answer:
Difference between conventional research design and qualitative research design
(1) Conventional uses numerical data while qualitative uses In depth information
(2) Conventional uses statistical tests for analysis while qualitative needs a lot of time to analyze
(3) Conventional is generalizable while qualitative is less generalizable
(4) Conventional is mostly deductive while qualitative is mostly inductive
(5) Conventional Includes surveys, observations, documents of numerical information while qualitative includes in depth interviews, focus groups and --detailed documents
(6) Conventional is Less bias
Is called a self-fulfilling prophecy. This is a prediction that becomes true due to a change in behavior that allows the prophecy to be fulfilled, this makes the person believe that their perception was true and consider the prophecy as real. This effect is very similar to the confirmation bias. The term was coined by the sociologist Robert Merton.
I hope my answer can help you.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
We see the effects of perpetuated industrialization in every aspect of our lives; in the fetishism of commodities and in the rapid commodification of every aspect of our lives, in the development of capital to the point where it and its constituents are the sole dictators of society, and through the effects of industrialization on the globe, climate, etc.
We also can empirically and easily see that wealth inequality has been inevitably rising over time, as the gap between rich and poor has been getting wider over the years. Marx claimed that the industrial revolution had polarised the gap between the owners of the means of production (the capitalist class, the bourgoesie) and the workers (the proletariat) even further, and such was obviously true and is apparent in any analysis of the aforementioned event.
