Explanation:
Mind map of sahyadri hills frame design
Answer:
Ralph Waldo Emerson analyzes in his essay “Nature” the way in which human beings perceive the surrounding world.
Explanation:
Ralph Waldo Emerson analyzes in his essay “Nature” the way in which human beings perceive the surrounding world. Describing different elements present in the countryside, the objects around, the other alive beings, the stars, among other elements that compound this world that we humans share. He says that we are never alone, God is always present according to Emerson. He talks about God as the link between the forming human beings and the universal spirit. Emerson also mentions that nature is the connection process of stimulation for creativity in order for human beings to find the meaning and contact with the spiritual dimension.
Answer:
The correct answer is: Super Ego.
Explanation:
The concepts of Ego, Id, And Super Ego are key elements in the Freudian theory of human psyque.
To Freudian Psychoanalysis, the Id represents all of the libidinal impulses that tend to be wild and hedonistic in nature.
The Ego, refers to the individuals consciousness and how he deals with the pulsional forces that come from the Id.
The Super Ego, is the ideal individual. The Super Ego is morality, ethics, and adaptation to society.
In this particular case, Susanna has a strong Super Ego, while Roger's ID is a dominant part of his personality.
Answer: Displacement is the correct answer.
Explanation: Displacement is a psychological defense mechanism that allows negative feelings to be transferred from the original source of stress or frustration to a less threatening subject in order to avoid negative consequences or release unpleasant feelings.
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
