The correct answer is: "the private citizen who owns the factory".
It would be more accurate to say the private citizens who own the factory, as it is likely that the capital of the corporation is divided in shares, whose owners are in turn, also owners of the corporation in the proportion evidenced by the number of shares they hold.
The losses generated by the fire will be assumed by the capital available in the firm, and due to the increase suffered in the costs, owners will suffer a decrease in their dividends which are the return they receive for their invesment. In case that the available capital is not enough, investors can decide either to invest more money or to let the corporation go bankrupt. It is possible that the local community provides some aid in terms of funding in a mixed economy, to prevent job losses for example, but it is not mandatory that they do so.
In order to afford the large and immediate payments required in case of an unpredictable disaster or accident without risking the solvency of the whole business, firms sign insurance contracts and make periodic payments so that in case of an accident the insurance company would face all costs.
D- could not be, this did not happen until 1979.
among the three remaining ones I think that the best option is <span>c. Women's entrance into the workforce during World War I- this gave the women the power of persuasion</span>
It was just one of the MANY reasons that resulted in the 2nd WW. Maybe if they hadn't been so harsh towards Germany and blamed them for the cause of WW1 then the 2nd one most likely wouldn't have happened.
The Zimmerman telegram was a message sent by Germany to MEXICO to cripple a few of their states in 1917 during the first world war. The transmission never reached mexico however and was intercepted by British inelegance.
