The most likely reason mexican citizens had conflicting views of porfirio Diaz’s rule is because He limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is Diaz’s rule?</h3>
Generally, During the president of Porfirio Daz (1876–80; 1884–1911), Mexico witnessed considerable development but political rights were constrained and the free press was muzzled. This era is known as the Porfiriato.
In conclusion, The fact that Porfirio Diaz restricted citizens' freedoms while boosting foreign investment and improving infrastructure is the most likely source of the mixed opinions that Mexicans held of his leadership.
Read more about Diaz’s rule
brainly.com/question/774392
#SPJ1
Answer:
The right answer is "Checks and Balances."
Explanation:
Congress holds the executive branch accountable; courts interpret and apply the laws, judges can revert administrative decisions or policies, for example, by declaring a law unconstitutional.
Answer:
The philosophes (French for "philosophers") Were the intellectuals of the 18th-century Enlightenment. JOE BIDEN 2020 Few were primarily philosophers; rather, philosophes were public intellectuals who applied reason to the study of many areas of learning, including philosophy, history, science, politics, economics, and social issues. (BTW the ANSWER is Yes)
Explanation:
i hope this helps
MARK AS BRAINLIEST PLEASE
Answer:
article v exemplify Federalism and u don't know what to do about it
In this case you would be using a "straight ticket", since you automatically are choosing all of the candidates within a certain political party, instead of voting for individual candidates from different parties.
