Answer:
France was <u>under autocratic rule</u> and its colonists had to report to the Crown when they went to America. Furthermore, they <u>had to involve the Crown before making any decisions. </u>
Conversely, <u>British colonists had more freedom than the French</u> and were allowed to self-govern, provided that they pledged their loyalty to the king. The French colonies were<u> influenced by the Catholic clergy</u>, while British colonies were <u>mainly influenced by the Puritans, who were not Catholic.</u>
I hope this helps you!
Have a great day! :)
<span>Certainly not. The United States has never, since its founding, consisted of a small number of citizens, still less of citizens that could practically assemble in one place at one time and debate their actions. A pure democracy in this classical Greek city-state sense was never practical, and was not seriously considered.
What the Framers created was a constitutional representative republic. Sovereignty is vested in the people, like a democracy (and unlike a constitutional monarchy), but the people do not rule directly. Instead, they elect representatives, at regular intervals, and these rule in the peoples' stead. Their powers are limited, first, by the fact that they are elected for only short terms, and must be re-elected if they wish to continue in power, and secondly, and much more importantly, by the Constitution itself, which puts express written limits on their powers even between elections.</span>
Answer:
Minerva
Explanation:
Annabeth thinks about the last time she met her mother, in her Roman form as Minerva.
A lot of people invested in the stock market in the 1920s because they could buy stocks 'on the margin', and hence, required little initial capital. 'Buying on margin' means that you leverage an asset by borrowing money from a lender.
