C. Many African and Asian nations are based on former colonial boundaries.
Explanation:
The European imperialism managed to have impact on much of the world. The Americas, Africa, Asia, Australia, Oceania were all heavily impacted. While some former colonies managed to fully move away and almost have no trace that they were colonies, many still have bad consequences from it.
One of those traces and consequences are the boundaries. The majority of the African countries and some countries in Asia still have the colonial boundaries. While this may not seem as a problem it is actually a very big one. The reason as to why this is problem is that people from different religious, ethnic, and linguistic groups have been put in the same borders. Lot of these groups traditionally have bad blood between them and don't tolerate each other.
This situation in many cases has resulted in internal division of the countries. Multiple civil wars have occurred and even genocides. The tensions still persist to this day and unfortunately don't seem like they will be calmed down anytime soon.
Answer:
Hello. You did not attach the document that the question refers to. However, I can help you by stating that Emperor Jahangir had a positive view of English merchants in the Mughal empire.
Explanation:
Jahangir was the ruler of the Mogul Empire between the years 1605 and 1627. He saw the commercial relationship between the Mongols and the English much more profitable than the relationship he had previously with the Portuguese and therefore he thought that the presence of English merchants in the Mughal empire. This can be seen in the letter he sent to King James I, where in a very polite way he demonstrates the desire to establish friendship and cooperation between the two nations.
<span>It was definitely the gold rush. Everyone was going to California to get gold, whether they did or not. I hoped I helped :]</span>
The answers would be a b and e
Trial by Jury. The right to a trial by jury, one of the most time-honored inheritances from Magna Carta in United States law, refers to the guarantee that courts will depend on a body of citizens to render judgments in most civil and criminal cases.
