1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Misha Larkins [42]
3 years ago
14

A major finding from Levinson's Seasons of a Man's Life (Transitions through adulthood) was: 1. men were extremely dissatisfied

with their current home and work lives 2. men began to re-examine their work and attempted to obtain less dominating positions 3. men who have made work and career a priority shifted gears in midlife and made family and family life a concern 4. men after age 50 wanted to forge a few path or modify the old one
English
1 answer:
Romashka [77]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

3. men who have made work and career a priority shifted gears in midlife and made family and family life a concern.

Explanation:

in the year 1977 a graduate of psychology from Yale University developed a comprehensive theory on man's development to adulthood, the underlying pattern of an individual's life at every point in time was the major focus of the theory, the theory states that a person's life is shaped majorly by their social and immediate environment and it involves his family and work with other variables like religion and his racial inclination.

In his theory "Levinson's Seasons of a Man's Life" there are two key concepts:

1) the Stable Period - This is the period when a person makes crucial choices in life.

2) the Transitional Period - This is the end of a person's stage to which a new one is expected to begin. Life during these transitions periods can be either rocky or smooth, good or bad, but the quality and significance of one’s life commitments often change between the starting and the ending of a period.

You might be interested in
I really don't have a conflict that I experienced I tried to just come up with one but I can't, it doesn't have to be a real con
valentina_108 [34]
Try to think of a disagreement or agreement you've EVER had with a family member. Even if you are exaggeration or making a bit of it up I believe it to be fine. Write about something simple like disagreement over the last cookie or bed time.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the following excerpt from Maya Angelou’s "I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings" and answer the question.
slava [35]

She means that being a black southerner sucked, but it sucked even worse in the hot summer afternoons, which were hot and humid and uncomfortable and by which time everybody had been working hard all day, than in the mornings, when it was more comfortable and people had just gotten out of bed and weren't completely awake and aware of their lousy situation in life.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Poach
Sedaia [141]

Answer:

poach, or "to poach" is from the Middle English word "pocchen".

It means bagged, enclosed in a bag, or like a pouch.

The word poaching is a noun and is the illegal practice of trespassing on another person's property to hunt or kill game without permission from the person who owns the land.  

Can be used as a verb - he is poaching/he is trespassing, stealing, taking fish or game illegally

Explanation:

I would think that the most common would be to trespass on someone's property to hunt or fish without permission.  (4)

If you are in a part of the world that eats a lot of eggs, then poach is used as a verb to cook  - to poach eggs - poach in a hot liquid but not boiling.

People should not poach wildlife for money.

8 0
2 years ago
Misogyny : women ::
pashok25 [27]
Misogyny is the hatred or discrimination against women, so your answer should be two words that have that relationship.
You know that A is not correct because divest means to take away possessions, and that isn't hatred against property.
You know that B is not correct because pathological means relating to disease, not hatred to disease.
Finally, you know that C can't be the right answer because progeny means descendants, not hatred of children.

Misogamy is the hatred of marriage, so D is your answer.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Reread lines 1624–1651. What does this section of dialogue demonstrate about Mr. Frank and Mr. Dussel?
Nonamiya [84]

Answer:

From the Reread lines 1624–1651, the section of dialogue suggests that Mr. Frank is extra careful, while Mr Dussel is a risk taker.

Explanation:

The section of dialogue signifies from the Reread lines 1624-1651, that they both did not see eye to eye on these types of situations.

Mr Frank thinks it is better to be careful than regretting later and Mr Dussel is willing to take the risk. (with answering the phone)

What this implies is that, Mr.Frank is trying to play safe and be careful of things, while Mr Dussel is willing to take the necessary risk by answering the phone.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following could best replace the word "mobile" in this sentence? In fact, my first trip to Washington was a mobile 
    7·2 answers
  • How does the author's tone change in paragraphs 27 and 28
    12·2 answers
  • Can u tell me some disadvantage of mobile phone ​
    5·2 answers
  • Determining Fallacious Reasoning
    13·2 answers
  • Remember the longest Journey have made a write a paragraph describing it.​
    8·1 answer
  • The context of a narrators point of view provides clues about:
    15·2 answers
  • Why was Eliezer placed in the hospital?
    13·2 answers
  • 1. Is research online reliable? Why or Why not?
    6·1 answer
  • Lennie dabbled his big paw in the water and wiggled his
    5·2 answers
  • Name all the characters in ninjago
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!