Answer:Adams cautioned against those who “think it as easy for a nation to change its government, as for a man to change his coat.”[9] Just as he did not think Europe's institutions could be imposed on America, Adams also believed that America's political beliefs could not be imposed on other nations
Explanation:
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
the gulf costal plains because it would be easy to get water for the crops
Answer:
D
Explanation:
out of the above options the most important one that is highlighted is power divided between National and state governments . Before the United States Constitution when we had the Articles of Confederation, power was divided between the national and state governments but not fairly . it seemed that state governments have more power than the national government and that created a lot of problems within the economy and within the law system and within the country itself. When we created the Constitution of the United States of America we use the system called checks and balances which made sure that no one branch or no state government had more power than another and we made sure that power was divided between the national and state governments power was divided between the national and state governments but not fairly . it seemed that steak of Herman's had more power than the national government and that created a lot of problems with in the economy and within the law system and within the country itself. When we created it cost to shine of the United States of america we used a system call checks and balances which made sure that no one branch or no state governments had more power than another and we made sure that power was divided between the Nationals take governments . Currently the national government is higher up than a state government but the state government does still have a lot of Liberties like creating schools and Roads
Answer:
The answer is compensating wage differentials.
Explanation:
The term refers to an extra amount of money that should be offered to a worker in order to perform a difficult, dangerous or undisirable job. On the other hand, it's also possible to offer a <u>negative</u> differential for jobs that may be desirable or easy to perform (they get paid less).
Some factors to consider are risk of injury or risk of future unemployment.
