Answer:
The answer is A
Step-by-step explanation:
$20,000 • .12= $2,400
$2,400 • 3= $7,200
$20,000 - $7,200= $12,800
$12,800
Answer:
2.47 yeahhh I think...........
Step-by-step explanation:
2.47 i think
I think c and b are correct answers
Answer:
b. We have very strong evidence that the long-run average guess of the population size of Milwaukee, Wisconsin is smaller with the anchor of Green Bay than with the anchor of Chicago.
Step-by-step explanation:
Smaller p-value indicates a strong evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis which means we can reject the null hypothesis. In the given scenario the p-value is 0.0001 which is very small. There is sufficient evidence for the rejection of null hypothesis.
I think
J,BB,S
(I shortened name to letter)
