The answer is: C. Not to try and fix them all, but also not participate in them
Thoreau just want people to know that evil exist and there we might not be able to eliminate them completely. By knowing this, we can always prepare ourselves to take care of evils when we need but not completely lose our mind over it. Simply by choosing not to participate is often enough because the more people do it, the less evil would exist in this world.
Answer:
a and c is the answer of this question
The bystander effect is the presence of other people creating a diffusion of responsibility.
<h3>What is bystander effect?</h3>
- According to the bystander effect, commonly referred to as bystander apathy, people are less likely to assist a victim when several people are present.
- In basic psychology textbooks, the horrifying murder of a young lady named Catherine "Kitty" Genovese is the most frequently cited instance of the bystander effect.
- On March 13, 1964, a Friday, Genovese, then 28 years old, was on his way home from work.
<h3>Describe a bystander impact example.</h3>
- The young woman Kitty Genovese, who was murdered in Queens, New York, in 1964 as several of her Neighbours watched, is the most famous real-life example of the bystander effect.
- Before it was too late, no one stepped in.
Learn more about bystander effect here:
brainly.com/question/9090584
#SPJ4
<span>Actually here in this scenario the only advantage of divorce is that person can again become independent in life and from all other unwanted relations, there by even look for a new person or new independent life in future, where as disadvantages are many mainly that person looks very negative infront of other people or socially, then that person will be psychologically weak and yes living together is very different from marriage as there is no big responsibilities like in marriage life.</span>
