It will take 8.04 years for the initial investment of $15000 to become $30,000
What is the future value of an investment?
The future value of $15,000 invested now earning a rate of return of 9% per year is $30,000, it the future equivalent of an amount invested now when the invested amount has earned interest over a specific period of time.
The below future value formula of single cash flow can be used to determine the number of years it takes for the initial investment to double.
FV=PV*(1+r)^N
FV=future value=$30,000
PV=initial investment=$15,000
r=rate of return=9%
N=number of years it takes for the initial investment to double=unknown(assume it is X)
$30,000=$15000*(1+9%)^N
$30000/$15000=(1+9%)^N
2=1.09^N
take log of both sides
ln(2)=N*ln(1.09)
N=ln(2)/ln(1.09)
N=8.04 years
Find out more about future value on:brainly.com/question/24703884
#SPJ1
Answer:
True
Explanation:
According to MM, without taxes, the market value of the company is not affected by capital structure. As a result, the WACC is unaffected by capital structure. Here, the value of a company is determined by cash flows.
In the case where there is tax, the value of a company with debt is greater than that of the same company without debt for the same level of income.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": bonuses are deferred salary rather than extra pay for extra sales performance.
Explanation:
In the corporate world, entitlement culture refers to the workers' beliefs that they deserve a series of privileges. This tends to happen during growth periods. Employees assume that the optimal situation of the firm has to do with their performances then, the organization owes them.
An idea that is commonly spread under such a scenario is that bonuses and commissions are deferred salaries and not extra payment for outstanding performance.
Answer:
b. 300,000 shares being sold is an issuer transaction and the 200,000 shares being sold is a non-issuer transaction.
Explanation:
A non-issuer transaction is a transaction that does not directly benefit an issuer or it was not directly executed to benefit an issuer.
According to the Uniform State Law, an entity involved in the sales of certificates of interest, leases, mining titles among others is officially exempted from being labelled as an issuer. Hence, the entity (officers of the firm) in the question are non-issuer brokers.
Specifically, when the sales of stock are carried out by someone or an individual who is not a registered stockbroker, that individual officially becomes what is called 'a non-issuer broker-dealer'. The implication is that such a transaction is to be exempted from the registration requirements of the Security Exchange Commission.
In this question, since the issuer newly issued 300,000 shares while the remaining 200,000 in the proposed combination was offered by Officers of the firm - non-issuer broker-dealers. The Law states that it must be separated to show that 300,000 shares are sold in an issuer transaction (Primary) directly involving an official issuer while 200,000 shares are sold in a non-issuer transaction (Secondary).
The company can't afford to pay their employees. If you have 100$ you can have ten people working for 10$ an hour and pay everyone for one hour. You can't have 10 people getting paid 20$ because the company would lose money. So if they are paid 20$ per hour, the company can only afford to hire 5 employees.
