The section from the poem "The Caged Birds" illustrates the condition of the bird which has no control over its fate. It is explicitly captured within a prison and metaphors like "clipped wings" and "tied feet" propose that even if it tried, it is bound not to leave the premise it is contained in.
Further, in "Sonnet 29", the writer's allegorical language and expression portray the image of the narrator in the society where he feels unwanted. However, in the provided lines of the sonnet, the speaker laments on his position as an outcast and failure, also suggesting that this fate cannot be suppressed. Again, here, the condition of the narrator cannot be changed, same as the bird's situation.
Therefore, the common connotation suggested by the two excerpts is: "they both are angry at their circumstances," because they are stuck within their unfortunate conditions.
Answer:
it offends me to the soul to hear a robustious periwig-pated fellow tear a passion to tatters
Explanation:
brainly.com/question/1966252
Hope this helps.
<u>Answer:</u>
The ambiguity in Daisy Miller: A Study is best represented by the use of natural settings. So, here the right answer is Option D.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Henry James’s novel “Daisy Miller” talks about a girl named Daisy Miller whom Winterbourne met abroad. The character Daisy has different traits. She is independent, spirited but also shallow and not to forget an absolute flirt. She has no charm and wit but can manipulate really well so that she stays as the centre of attraction.
The author uses various natural settings to build this character ambiguously. This means that the character doesn’t come up with any specific traits. It is not very clear whether Daisy is good or bad. Winterbourne is also facing the same dilemma. It is up to the reader to interpret Daisy’s actions and draw a conclusion about her personality.
D because if you read this carefully you need to see how it feels to you
