I would say yes, because a person would want to know fully what they are getting into.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Individuals in high-context cultures do not show the above mentioned traits. High-context cultures requires elegance and sophisticated attitude and behavior and not much of the direct interaction in an unnecessary conversation. Rather, these traits of direct verbal interaction, value individualism, relying on logic, saying "NO" directly, and giving authority to written information are traits of low-context cultures. Therefore, the given statement is false.
Answer:
The argument that the higher courts had decided the cases of similar facts and circumstance in such a way that he can expect that the court rules in his company's favor is a valid argument. The argument is based on the doctrine of stare decisions. The meaning of the doctrine stare decisions is to stand on decided cases. It is a common practice to decide the case based on the former decisions of the judicial systems. It is a set principle that if the court of higher rank has set a precedent then lower court must adhere to it. Therefore, this argument is a valid argument.
The courts are bound to follow the rule set by its higher authority. However, it is not always necessary to obligate its precedents and sometimes, the court can depart from this rule. This could be done only in the circumstances where it is found that the precedent is simply incorrect or due to social changes or technological changes made the precedent inapplicable. Therefore, the court in this case can not necessarily be ruled as the other courts had done.
<span>3.7%. The alpha is equal to 0.12 times (0.05 + 1.1(08-.05)).</span>
