Answer:
1. $100,000 and 25%
2. $137,200 and 34.3%
3. $150,000 and 27%
Explanation:
1. It does not expand
a. Net income= $100,000 (as given in the question)
b. Return on equity= (net income)/(shareholder’s equity)
Shareholder’s equity= $400,000
Thus return on equity= 100000/400000 = 0.25 or 25%
2. It expands and issue $160,000 in debt
a. Net income= $100000 + 50000 – 12800 (debt interest 8% of $160000)
= $137,200
b. Return on equity= (net income)/(shareholder’s equity)
= 137200/400000
=0.343 or 34.3%
3. It expands and raises equity of $160000
a. Net Income= $100000 + 50000
= $150000
b. Return on equity= (net income)/(shareholder’s equity)
= 150000/(400000 + 160000)
Where ($560,000) 400000 + 160000 is shareholder’s equity
= 0.27 or 27%
Answer: IND report
Explanation:
A sponsor investigator has numerous roles to perform which includes
Control of the investigational drug
Record retention
Reporting
Assurance of IRB review
Inspection.
So, under the reporting role he or she will be saddled with the responsibility of giving an annual report of the IND investigation.
Answer:
No option is correct, since you will have 200 shares and each share should be worth around $60.
Explanation:
If the 2-for-1 stock split takes place then you will have 200 shares instead of 100. For every 1 share that you currently own, the corporation will issue another share.
Since the price of the shares was $120 before the stock split, after the stock split the price will be divided by two (the same proportion). So each new share will cost approximately $60.
In order for option 2 to be correct, the stock spit should have been 3-for-1.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: This is an example of used a(n):___, would be, A: Conceptual framework to solve new problems.
Explanation:
A conceptual framework is a an analytical method, or technique, that is used in order for the person to be able to see the full picture, and the different variants and factors around it, in an organized manner. Applying this technique will allow a person to discover all the factor within an issue, visualize them and propose viable solutions to them. And this is what Mark did when he came by the non-standard transaction type. He still had to record the transaction, but the usual methods would not work for it. Therefore, Mark made use of his own knowledge and after viewing the problem through the conceptual framework technique, he was able to find a reasonable solution and thus filfill his job.
