Answer:
Prepare a single-step income statement for the year ended December 31, 2020
Explanation:
SUNLAND CORPORATION
Inconme statement
For the year endend December 2020
Revenue
Net Sales 2.425.800
Interes Revenue 38.200
Total Revenue 2.464.000
Expenses
Cost Of goods 1.458.200
Administrative expenses 212.600
Selling xpenses 282.000
Interes expense 46.400
Tax rate 139.440
Expenses 2.138.640
Net income 325.360
Shares issued 70210
Earning p/share 4,63
Answer: The cases in which the Review Commission renders decisions arise from inspections conducted by a Federal agency separate from the Review Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which is a part of the Department of Labor. OSHRC, or the Review Commission, and OSHA were created by the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, but the Act mandated that the Review Commission be an independent agency (i.e., not part of another Federal department) to ensure that parties to agency cases receive impartial hearings.
Explanation:
Answer:
$418,550
Explanation:
Steps are shown below:
a. The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:
= 
= 
= 2,040 units
b. The number of orders would be equal to
= Annual demand ÷ economic order quantity
= $52,000 ÷ 2,040 units
= 25.49 orders
c. The average inventory would equal to
= Economic order quantity ÷ 2
= 2040 units ÷ 2
= 1,020 units
d. The total cost of ordering cost and carrying cost equals to
Ordering cost = Number of orders × ordering cost per order
= 25.49 orders × $50
= $1,275
Carrying cost = average inventory × carrying cost per unit
= 1,020 units × $1.25
= $1,275
So, the total annual cost would be
= Purchase cost + ordering cost + carrying cost
= $416,000 + $1,275 + $1,275
= $418,550
Purchase cost = Annual demand × cost per unit
= 52,000 × $8
= $416,000
Cloud computing company provides the information
Answer: Ralph does not have a good claim against Snowdrop, because age was not the deciding factor in Snowdrop’s decision to lay off Ralph.
Explanation: The reason for the firm laying off Ralph is vague and not explicitly stated. Therefore Ralph cannot make a claim against Snowdrop for laying him off due to his age.
