Answer:
equivalent annual cost: 19,784.81
The investment is not economically justified as it is cheaper to pay the fines than invest in the equipment to avoid them.
Explanation:
We calcualte the PMT of a 75,000 dollars equipment at 10%
PV 75,000
time 5
rate 0.1
C $ 19,784.811
EPA fines: <u> </u><u>$ 18,500.00 </u>
differential: (1, 284.81)
Answer:
B) Tom's statements provide grounds to set the contract aside.
Explanation:
When we are talking about setting a contract aside, it means that the contract is voidable. A voidable contract is valid until one of the parts decides to void it. In this case, if Victoria decides to purchase Tom's car and later discovers that he lied about the price, she can void the contract and return the car to get her money back.
What Tom is doing is basically lying about the material facts of the product that they are bargaining and it represents a valid reason for voiding the contract.
Answer:
i would say asking a team member in a team meeting why their work is lagging behind schedule
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is $151 per share.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the computation of the given data are as follows:
Currently selling price = $151 per share
So, we can calculate the Current market value by using following formula:
Current market value (price) of stock = Currently selling price of stock
As, Currently selling price of stock is already given.
Than, Current market value (price) of stock = $151 per share.
They have no clean water!