African-American slaves believed that they should be given land that they worked on so that they could be free and have their own land and make their own produce. This is why Sherman made the promise of 40 acres and a mule, however, they didn't get it. All of the land was given back to the previous owners of the land and the African-Americans were given wages for their work.
NORTH:
Industrial economy based on manufacturing; support for tariffs—American goods could be sold at lower prices than could British goods
SOUTH
Agrarian economy based on agriculture; opposition to tariffs, which increased the cost of imported goods
WEST
Emerging economy; support for internal improvements and the sale of public lands
Regional differences had a major effect on Andrew Jackson’s presidency in the early 1800s.
One example is when the Congress passed the Tariff of Abominations. Vice President John C. Calhoun joined his fellow southerners in protest. Economic depression and previous tariffs had severely damaged the economy of his home state, South Carolina.
Calhoun used the Protest to advance the states’ rights doctrine. He argued that, because the states had formed the national government, state power should be greater than federal power. He believed states had the right to nullify, or reject, any federal law they judged to be unconstitutional.
Calhoun’s theory was controversial, and it drew some fierce challengers. Many of them were from the northern states that had benefited from increased tariffs.
These opponents believed that the American people, not the individual states, made up the Union. Conflict between the supporters and the opponents of nullification deepened. The dispute became known as the nullification crisis.
Answer:
A) Extensive trade in gold, ivory, and salt
Explanation:
This one is obvious. Not mercenaries. Not Christianity. And definitely not through isolation.
The answer is B.<span>a new system of producing goods by using machines rather than manual labor.
C and D are not about the </span>industrial revolution
I would need to agree that Radical Reconstruction was not sufficiently radical. The possibility of this was to change the south's general culture and conviction framework and make it more like the north. However the distinctive branches of the government couldn't deal with what was best for the country. Congress would pass laws that would help the liberated slaves, and after that the president would veto them, so congress would dwarf and abrogate the president. This occurred again and again. Because of this it was greatly hard for what the radicals needed to happen to be effective. There was insufficient power behind the new laws and amendment's, at any dislike they had utilized amid the common war