1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xeze [42]
4 years ago
7

What do historians intend to do when they make counterclaim?

History
2 answers:
kherson [118]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

They argue points that have not yet been proven.

elena-s [515]4 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is D) they oppose or point out problems with another person’s argument.

What historians intend to do when they make counterclaim is they oppose or point out problems with another person’s argument.

Historians do deep research in order to prove a point or to demonstrate the validity of an event or incident occurred in the past. There could be many opinions on different issues that question other historians arguments. That is when counterclaims are used. And the debate can be opened. Historians need to prove their points using facts, data, valid sources, interviews, testimonies, documents, audio or video.

The other options of the question were a) they argue points that have not yet been proven, b) they compare primary and secondary source materials, and c) they express biased opinions.  

You might be interested in
The first english navigation act, adopted during the rule of oliver cromwell:
allsm [11]
Thanks for the points. I need them to check my HW, and sorry be more specific next time when you’r asking Q..
8 0
3 years ago
Please select the best answer for the question.
Masja [62]

Answer:

Tundra

Explanation:

It's north of Georgia not west

7 0
2 years ago
What did socrates belive came from ignorance?
maks197457 [2]

He among you is the wisest who, like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is really worth nothing at all.


What does it mean? Socrates spoke with a man who was said by many to be wise, but found that this man, like countless others he had spoken to, had no more wisdom than Socrates had, [and that the man even became angry and refused to acknowledge his ignorance when Socrates showed him that this was so,] and therefore Socrates concluded that "it seems I am wiser than he is to this small extent, that I do not think I know what I do not know".

In other words, despite that all Socrates knows is that he has no wisdom, his wisdom isn't really "worth nothing at all". That is the paradox of Socratic ignorance.

4 0
4 years ago
Which Egyptian god was reborn every morning
iVinArrow [24]
Ra, the god of the sun.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why would Roman rulers have placed the marker in the Forum?
Olegator [25]

Answer:Emperador romano es el término utilizado por los historiadores para referirse a los gobernantes del Imperio romano tras el final de la República romana.

En la Antigua Roma no existía el título de «emperador romano», sino que este título era más bien una abreviatura práctica para una complicada reunión de cargos y poderes. A pesar de la popularidad actual del título, el primero en ostentarlo realmente fue Miguel I Rangabé a principios del siglo IX, cuando se hizo llamar Basileus Rhomaion (‘emperador de los romanos’). Hay que tener en cuenta que en aquella época el significado de Basileus había cambiado de ‘soberano’ a ‘emperador’. Tampoco existía ningún título o rango análogo al título de emperador, sino que todos los títulos asociados tradicionalmente al emperador tenían su origen en la época republicana.

La discusión sobre los emperadores romanos está influenciada en gran medida por el punto de vista editorial de los historiadores. Los mismos romanos no compartían los modernos conceptos monárquicos de «imperio» y «emperador». Durante su existencia, el Imperio romano conservó todas las instituciones políticas y las tradiciones de la República romana, incluyendo el Senado y las asambleas.

En general, no se puede describir a los emperadores como gobernantes de iure. Oficialmente, el cargo de emperador era considerado como el «primero entre iguales» (primus inter pares), y muchos de ellos no llegaron a ser gobernantes de facto, sino que frecuentemente fueron simples testaferros de poderosos burócratas, funcionarios, mujeres y generales.

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who had orders to take away the weapons of the Massachusetts militia? a. George Washington c. Thomas Gage b. William Dawes d. Pa
    14·2 answers
  • The layout of the Temple was very similar to the Tabernacle, but much
    10·2 answers
  • What economic activity was most widespread in the United States in the early 1800s
    6·1 answer
  • Plz help me pl zplz pl zplz pzl pl z nneeeeeeeed asap
    15·1 answer
  • List one fact About George Washington.
    6·2 answers
  • What two houses make up parliament
    13·1 answer
  • plz help ASAP if ur good with history and lerned about perl habor!! you dot have to answer all of them
    12·1 answer
  • Which letter on the map identifies the Mexican Plateau
    9·2 answers
  • I need help asap :( (It's for an exam)
    7·2 answers
  • What advantage did the soldiers in Philip's army have?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!