Personal Freedom can only be guaranteed in a rule where the person can decide who rules.
Explanation:
In communism the state has the highest power, over the people.
That means that the state can decide when to restrict the movement of the people or to take away their personal freedom from them if the state deigns it so.
In democracy that is not possible.
The personal freedom of movement and of expression are some of the inalienable rights of a true democracy.
No matter what happens these are the rights that are enshrined to a democracy safeguarded by the elections.
Are there any options? :)
Answer:
Monarchs in some constitutional monarchies, and presidents in semi-presidential republics are often considered to be figureheads. Commonly cited figureheads include Elizabeth II,[1][2] who is queen of 16 Commonwealth realms and head of the Commonwealth, but has no power over the nations in which she is not head of government and does not exercise power in her own realms on her own initiative. Other figureheads include the emperor of Japan and the king of Sweden, as well as presidents in a majority of parliamentary republics, such as the president of India, Israel, Bangladesh, Greece, Hungary, Germany, Pakistan. Some head of states in one-party communist states also have limited powers, such as President of China (when not simultaneously holding the CCP General Secretary and CMC Chairman posts).
Answer:
The Seventeenth Amendment allowed for the direct election of A. SENATORS by the citizens.
Explanation:
<span>Despite the North's greater population, however, the South had an army almost equal in size during the first year of the war. The North had an enormous industrial advantage as well. At the beginning of the war, the Confederacy had only one-ninth the industrial capacity of the Union. But that statistic was misleading.</span>
