1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GarryVolchara [31]
3 years ago
11

(Forensic Science)

Advanced Placement (AP)
2 answers:
aliina [53]3 years ago
7 0
I think the answer is All of the above
leonid [27]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

was it right?

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What history lessons did Hitler forget in 1941? Explain.
kotegsom [21]

Explanation:

I'm not sure there is any direct evidence that it was strategically a bad idea. Strategically it made sense to attack the Soviet Union while they were weak and unprepared for war. Hitler knew that as he made progress on the Western front that Stalin grew more and more nervous every day about the growing power of Nazi Germany.

What must be remembered is that Hitler almost won the war with the Soviet Union. Hitler felt the army was not moving fast enough towards Moscow. If Hitler's commanders had done what Hitler had wanted, which was rush as fast to Moscow as possible, then it is possible the Soviet Union would have fallen without time to prepare a massive infantry army. Germany's army was also not prepared for fighting in cold weather. It was not expected that the Soviet Union was even close to capable of fighting back. The Soviet Union's army was in shambles throughout the entire war. It was ill-equipped and all it had to offer was quantity over quality.

The combination of the cold, unexpected resistance and the amount of time it was taking to get to Moscow because of cold weather and resistance was setting back Germany. The whole strategy was to get in and occupy Moscow and take the leadership. It took about six months for the Germans to get nearly to the gates of Moscow, when the tide finally started to turn at Stalingrad. Hitler most importantly underestimated the sheer will of the the country to defend itself no matter how much the cost in blood. The Soviet Union lost a whopping 13.5% of its population to the war.

So in short, strategically a lot of it made sense at the time. The operation was blundered because the blitzkrieg was not fast enough, the underestimation of the kind of force the Soviet Union could pull together and an underestimation of the cold winter. The plan was also delayed because of setbacks in the Balkans and helping the Italians out where they had failed.

It's hard to find actual strategic proof of what was going on through Hitler's mind and his advisors to take on this risky operation. We do know however that these had been a part of Hitler's plans for years. In my opinion, it was probably thought at the time the odds were in Nazi Germany's favor. In all reality, the Germans had a pretty good chance of winning the war within six months, perhaps if just a few variables had changed they might have actually pulled it off. If they could have gotten there a month earlier, they probably would have won.

Also Great Britain was absolutely in no position to put up any kind of resistance except for the occasional bombing run, which was producing much larger losses than they could keep up with equipment wise.

Also Stalin and Hitler were not real allies, they only had a non-aggression pact, and both were not exactly known to be trustworthy. Stalin was also at many times gullible and Hitler took advantage of this diplomatically. Even when warned that Germany was going to invade, Stalin dismissed his advisers.

Taking in all these factors, the thought probably never occurred to Hitler and his officers that the Soviet Union would ever be able to launch any kind of counter attack. It took quite some time and the United States to intervene for the Soviet Union to really begin its successful counter-offensive.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
TRUE OR FALSE QUIZ NO CHEATING
pochemuha
True
False
True
False
False
True
True
False
True
False
False
False
4 0
3 years ago
HELP NO LINKS I NEED AN ANSWER
NikAS [45]

Answer:

it's the last one, all of the others don't make enough sense

4 0
3 years ago
Which rock was subjected to intense heat and pressure but did not solidify from magma?
Lelu [443]
The answer for you question is this:

B)Schist

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
describe one instance when the supreme cort "took on the president "and reduced the power of the office
dezoksy [38]
1974 - United States v. Nixon

This decision established that executive privilege is neither absolute nor unqualified.
Situation: President Richard Nixon's taped conversations from 1971 onward were the object of subpoenas by both the special prosecutor and those under indictment in the Watergate scandal. The president claimed immunity from subpoena under executive privilege.
The Court decided against Nixon 8-0.

Historical significance:
The president is not above the law. After the Court ruled on July 24, 1974, Richard Nixon resigned
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who is percy jacksons brother need it for my test please and thnks
    6·2 answers
  • The socially determined behaviors expected of a person performing a role are called role performances.
    15·1 answer
  • In Africa, parasitic diseases such as malaria are most likely to occur and spread in __________ regions near the Equator.
    9·2 answers
  • Can someone tell me the sequence of events in the action potential at any one point along the axon?
    9·1 answer
  • Identify whether each assessment tool is a value inventory or an interest inventory. Strong Interest Inventory
    5·2 answers
  • When Emily Dickinsons poems were published what was used for titles
    9·1 answer
  • ito ang ahensiya ng pamahalaan na nangangasiwa sa mga alituntunin at mga polisiya na may kinalaman sa paggawa sa buong bansa.​
    12·1 answer
  • Which denomination is the most popular in the US?
    6·1 answer
  • Including information in a new product that has already been classified is called
    13·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Solar heat absorbed through windows and roofs increases cooling costs, and incorpor
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!