Answer: E. weakness of a federal system
Explanation:
This is a weakness of the Federal system of government because it shows what happens when states have to become reliant on the federal government to carry out projects.
If there was no federal system, states would be more reliant on their own selves and would embark on their own projects. This means that Texas would have found a way to maintain those bridges without waiting for federal help.
Started from 1095
Juraselum
Anatolia
Answer:
In a confederate system of government, the majority of political power is based on the local government, while the central government has very little power. Local government has the power to act as they wish, which can cause conflicts between states and the central government.
The Confederation represents an alliance between states, reinforced by a common ruling body that has no higher central authority that would give the Confederacy a mark of sovereignty. The Confederation does not have any of the three state governments (legislative, executive, judicial).
Explanation:
The implementation of decisions is made unanimously (which carries a risk of inefficiency) and depends on the will of the member states because they implement decisions.
The Confederation, as a legal relationship between states, has neither a central authority, nor its territory, nor its population. The states sign an international treaty, not a constitution, so member states have both a veto right and a secession right. Therefore, the confederation cannot be even considered as a state, but rather an enhanced form of the alliance between states.
Answer:
I would Say C. It can lead to fighting over scarce resources.
Explanation:
Because this explanation will be strongly informed by the literature on political psychology and on past genocides, foremost the Holocaust.
Answer:
There are a couple of options for this.
1.) He got control over the people by manipulating them and making them be afraid.
2.) He prioritized the Aryan race... he wanted to make them the only race in the world.
3.) He also played the "blame-game" meaning that he blamed the Jews for all of their losses in WW1, all of the people of Germany were already butt hurt about this, so he just blamed it on the Jews. This manipulated all of the German people.
4.) I would say his MOST POWERFUL step was dictatorship. Once having all of the people's votes in Germany, that's when he started going, I guess. First, he took away everyone's guns so that they couldn't defend themselves, then, he made a bunch of meaningless rules. Once in power, he could pretty much do whatever he wanted to whoever he wanted...
Explanation:
Sorry for the long answer, but I really hope this helps you! Let me know if you have more questions.
