I'm stuck on the same question. C seems to be only somewhat reasonable answer.
Answer:
B). Its results are not generally applicable.
Explanation:
A case study is described as the research plan or an experimental investigation that primarily intends to observe or examine a phenomenon, individual, or a group(as representatives) within its authentic context to make generalized deductions or conclusions.
As per the question, option B best describes the outcomes of a case study. The description of 'its results are not generally applicable' reflects that the research could not lead to producing a generalized conclusion that can represent the other associated units intensively. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Your answer would be U.S district court.
There are (correct me if I'm wrong) 94 district courts throughout the USA, where small cases can be resolved. The case can also get moved up, eventually into the Supreme Court.
1. No confidentiality. This is the deadliest downfall of crowdsourcing. ... Putting your naming challenge out for crowdsourcing can clue in competitors to what you're up to and make it possible for someone else to see your great new idea and run away with it.
