Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
Answer:
50 POINTS!
Annotate the text by competing statement in the table.
As I read a question I have is
A text-to-self connection I can make is
A text-to-text connection I can make is
A text-to-world connection I can make is
An inference I can make is
My inference is supported by this evidence from the text:
I used the comprehension strategy , which helped me
After reading the text, a question I have is
incomplete questions
A duck dog tree trash can card matress pool water liquids
I think you can use your own experiences to better understand characters, events, and ideas.
The ways in which a president and her family spends their weekends.
