Between ideas would be the answer
Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because "Tevye's analogy is supporting the idea of marrying only Jews; however, it does not explain
the reason why this is supposed to happen".
<h3>How Tevye's analogy is different</h3>
Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because it doesn't give reasons to why one is supposed to "seek his own kind".
It is good to seek one's own kind so as to avoid the cultural problem in marriage. It helps to solve the problem of origin differences.
Culture is very important in any relationship. In order not to have different perspectives on an issue, it is ideal to go into relationships with people of the same culture.
Learn more about analogy:
brainly.com/question/13978016
Answer:
D. He says that the people of three continents support his side, so his
side must be right.
Explanation:
By stating that the people of three continents support his side, so his
side in order to get others to agree with his views, he is using a bandwagon arguement. Bandwagon is basically when someone uses the fact that the majority agrees with something side person also supports, then their view is correct. Since the majority agrees, then the person they are trying to convice should too.
For expensive;
The vehicle was very expensive, although the family could afford it.
