Explain the clear and present danger principle that justice holmes enunciated in the schenck decision

1 answer:

8 0

During World War I Antiwar protests gave rise to many significant free speech cases related to issues and fomenting violence. In the 1919 case Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court pointed that an antiwar activist did not have a First Amendment right to tribunal draft resistance.

Justice Holmes proposed the clear and present danger test, that would become a vital concept in First Amendment law; but the Schenck decision did not formally accept the test.

Holmes soon wrote his intention about the clear and present danger test. He intended the said test to refine, not replace, the bad tendency test<span>.

Hope this helps.</span>

You might be interested in

What protected Ghana from being conquered by Muslim armies in the 700

likoan [24]

The answer ; D , the vast desert

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following was a reason to support the Good Neighbor Policy? A. It forced the U.S. to compromise on foreign policy.

Kitty [74]

Answer:

A. It forced the U.S. to compromise on foreign policy.

Explanation:

The Good Neighbor policy was the foreign policy of the administration of United States President Franklin Roosevelt towards Latin America.

Globalization has greatly broadened America's foreign policy agenda. Infectious diseases, poverty, and poor governance not only offend our moral sensibilities but also represent potential new security threats.

4 0

4 years ago

How did the britain plan to fix its financial problem after the war

insens350 [35]

The created the stamp act that taxed colonist on all paper products that they used

6 0

3 years ago

Which best describes the Tao?

11111nata11111 [884]

Answer:

The way of nature.....

5 0

4 years ago

Ill give brain jus please helpppp How would limited immigration hurt agriculture in Georgia?

Anettt [7]

Answer: It would cut back on workers available since many are immigrants.

Explanation:

Agriculture is one of Georgia's largest industries and it is heavily reliant on migrant labor to do things like harvesting blueberries, onions and melons to name just a few.

Limited immigration would prevent the flow of these immigrants into the state which means that there would be less immigrants to do the harvesting and other agricultural related things. A major effect of this is that at a worst case scenario, this would cost Georgia millions if the crops are not picked on time.

6 0

3 years ago