(From quizlet) men do not trap with innocent questions to make fun of you; they are not hypocrites; ladies are hyper-critical and hypocrites
Answer:
A) Hiding secrets is exciting and dangerous
Explanation:
She's hiding secrets and feelings and she doesn't want anyone to know but she's excited to express herself privately doing this. She doesn't want her brother to think otherwis o f her if he does read it.
A crowd may form due to unintentional situations, such as accidents. For example, at a car crash, people crowd around the scene to see what happened. A mob is something like a gang that work together to achieve a common goal which is negative. For example, the mob robbed the rich lady of her purse which was stashed with money. A gathering usually form intentionally, such as in a Science classroom, the teacher wants to demonstrate an experiment and asks everyone to gather around the apparatus set up so that students get a better view. That is the difference between those 3 words. However, they all have something in common, which is many people coming together becuase of something.
Answer:
A. anticipating an objection her audience might have
D. making a counterargument
Explanation:
Virginia Woolf suggested the fictional idea of Shakespeare having an equally gifted sister. Through this, she wanted to show what would happen to her career and would she become as famous as her brother, all of that in order to show that women hadn't had equal opportunities as men, since the Renaissance to the 19th century. She also states that, women's purpose, regarded by society, was to stay at home, be hosewives and take care of the children. That way they couldn't earn money and provide for themselves. That was another obstacle for their career.
Here, in this excrept, we see that Woolf emphasizes the importance of material things in order for one tobecome famous poet. Stating this, she understands that manybwould disagree and she anticipates a potential objection to this claim ("...still you may say that the mind
should rise above such things; and that great poets have often been poor men."). Soon after this, she counterclaims this objection, stating a quoted evidence by Sir Arthur Quiller-Coach, a Professor of Literature ("The poor poet has not in these days, nor has had for two hundred years, a dog's chance...") to support her argument.