<em>Answer:</em>
The West Bank is ostensibly controlled by the Palestinian Authority and is under Israeli occupation. This comes as Israeli troops, who authorize Israeli security confinements on Palestinian development and exercises, and Israeli "pilgrims," Jews who assemble consistently growing networks in the West Bank that viably deny the land to Palestinians. Gaza is controlled by Hamas, an Islamist fundamentalist gathering, and is under Israeli bar however not ground troop occupation.
The essential way to deal with tackling the contention today is a purported "two-state arrangement" that would set up Palestine as a free state in Gaza and the greater part of the West Bank, leaving whatever is left of the land to Israel. In spite of the fact that the two-state plan is clear in principle, the opposite sides are still profoundly isolated over how to make it function by and by.
The option in contrast to a two-state arrangement is a "one-state arrangement," wherein the majority of the land turns out to be it is possible that one major Israel or one major Palestine. Most onlookers figure this would cause a bigger number of issues than it would comprehend, however, this result is ending up more probable after some time for political and statistic reasons.
The answer is C I don't know how to explain it but the answer is C
A. allusion
Allusion - to the Book of Genesis with “Eden" sinking to grief
i think
The Union. <span>Confederate forces launched a surprise attack against Union troops, but Union forces ultimately </span>hung<span> on and won</span>
