<span>The united states constitution delegates police powers mainly to the "federal government," since it leaves most remaining power, which are largely unmentioned, to the individual states. </span>
Oliver Hazard Perry,I believe.
<span>The spirit of improvement is part of the foundation of the type of personality of those who are innovators, inventors, and those who took part in the industrial revolution. The basic concept of wanting to improve upon ways to accomplish tasks is essential in the forward momentum, knowledge acquisition, and the improvement if society. Going all the way back to when humans had to hunt for survival, the spirit of improvement lead to the development of the spear over the club, the arrow over the spear, the hunting rifle over the arrow and so on and so forth. By improving on concepts and ideas we move society and humans forward. When it came to the industrial revolution, the spirit of innovation led to things like the assembly line which revolutionized the speed at which products were developed. The spirit of improvement was an essential component of the industrial revolution because without the desire to improve our lives we would still be hunting with clubs.</span>
Tribal nations were not in the US census instill the 1880
Pro slavery advocates believed slave owners had a right to transport slaves into the territories; antislavery advocates argued that this gave slave holding settlers an unfair advantage over non-slave holding settlers.
Pro slavery advocates argued that the slave status of Kansas should be determined by popular vote; antislavery advocates argued that Kansas should be free because of its location north of the 36° 30' parallel.
Pro slavery advocates contended that free African Americans in Kansas should not be permitted rights under the state constitution; antislavery advocates argued that the federal constitution took precedence over Kansas’s state constitution.
Pro slavery advocates held that slavery in the state was legal, as established in the Missouri Compromise of 1820; antislavery advocates argued that this legislation was invalidated by the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Dred Scott case.
