1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bixtya [17]
3 years ago
12

What case does Dr. King make against “well timed” action?

History
1 answer:
Vaselesa [24]3 years ago
8 0
We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed. Frankly I have never yet engaged in a direct action movement that was "well timed," according to the timetable of those who have not suffered unduly from the disease of segregation. For years now I have heard the word "Wait!" It rings in the ear of every Negro with a piercing familiarity. This "wait" has almost always meant "never." We must come to see with the distinguished jurist of yesterday that "justice too long delayed is justice denied."<span>

</span>
You might be interested in
Which was the usual payment from the slave ship captains for the captured Africans?
GuDViN [60]
Land grants in the colonies
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. [Part A] Which statement is true about the Aztecs and the Spaniards? *
ololo11 [35]

Answer:

The answer is D, The Spaniards took advantage of the Aztecs.

Explanation:

The Aztecs thought that the Spaniards where their gods, who where white figures coming to take residence in the empire and if the Aztecs did not give them what they wanted they would be killed by the Spaniards. So the Spaniards took all their lavish clothes and gold. The Spaniards kept this up for a while but eventually the Spaniards attacked and destroyed the Aztecs.

4 0
3 years ago
What were the two things Washington thought threatened the future of the United States?
artcher [175]

Answer:

permanent alliances and excessive debt

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ohhhhh I have a Brainliest for anyone who can answer this history question
Sergio [31]
1. b. executive agencies
2. c. the president's cabinet
3. a. appointment of friends
4. d. interactions

3 0
3 years ago
VERY IMPORTANT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Karolina [17]

Answer:

Here, I have presented the completion of your question along with options and answers.

Which best describes the role of the US Supreme Court in the 2000 presidential election?  

It declared George W. Bush the winner of the election.

It refused to become involved in the election.  

It ordered a recount in Florida, resulting in Bush’s election.

It stopped a recount in Florida, resulting in Bush’s election.

The correct answer for your question is option (D) – It stopped a recount in Florida, resulting in Bush’s election.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why scientific revolution is important to learn?
    6·1 answer
  • Lincoln Steffens’s The Shame of the Cities and
    15·1 answer
  • Im which city was the consitutional convention held?
    10·1 answer
  • HELP ME I CANT DO THEM
    12·1 answer
  • What did john locke claim should be done to an oppressive government​
    9·1 answer
  • Which sentence describes an effect of the printing press on the renaissance?
    14·2 answers
  • Describe what life was like for a cowboy on a cattle drive.
    5·2 answers
  • What does Emma Goldman's account of the Homestead strike emphasize about the experience of workers during this time period? A) T
    8·1 answer
  • How did goods get transported during the cattle trail?
    7·1 answer
  • Hi guys I’d really appreciate some help (:
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!