1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mekhanik [1.2K]
3 years ago
5

while most people who lived in ancient egypt avoided settling in the desert, those regions protected them from enemies . why do

you think this was true?
History
1 answer:
vesna_86 [32]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: Refer below!!

Explanation:

There are a number of reasons why this statement is true. Firstly, those residing in the desert were naturally acclimated to the harsh climate and lack of resources, while enemies of these people groups would have had great difficulty surviving in such an environment. Generally, if you were to wage an attack on a peoples, you'd need access to food, water, and adequate shelter, this was scarce in the desert. Add sandstorms, difficulty locating certain points due to the lack of observable landmarks, and the fact that one's body isn't naturally evolved to the climate, and any enemies of the Ancient Egyptians would find it impossibly brutal to wage attacks on them.

You might be interested in
Plains tribes used slash-and-burn techniques to __________. A. herd cattle B. clear land C. harvest buffalo resources D. hunt bu
-BARSIC- [3]
The correct answer is B. Slash and burning is a technique used to clear vegetation that is also beneficial to the earth because the ashes from the vegetation can help new vegetation grow in time.

Hope this helps
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does citizenship mean to you?
Ne4ueva [31]
<h2><em>what does citenzship mean to me:</em></h2>

<u><em>Citizenship is the status of being a citizen. If you have citizenship in a country, you have the right to live there, work, vote, and pay taxes! </em></u>

4 0
2 years ago
Can anyone please help this is due tomorrow
pshichka [43]

The difference between the two excerpts is that one shows men who are happy to have won and the other shows men wallowing in defeat.

<h3>What do the excerpts show?</h3>

One excerpt shows how happy the Allied soldiers were to have won the First World War.

The other shows how disappointed and in anguish the Germans were from losing the war to the Triple Entente.

Find out more on the Triple Entente at brainly.com/question/673841.

#SPJ1

7 0
1 year ago
Which was the biggest flaw in the Articles of Confederation?
Zina [86]

Answer:

D. It created a weak federal government with no powers to impose taxes or regulate trade.

Explanation:

The inability to tax.

Making revenue completely dependent on the state legislatures.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can conflict be a good thing ​
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
Conflict, while often avoided, is not necessarily bad. In fact, conflict can be good for organizations because it encourages open-mindedness and helps avoid the tendency toward group think that many organizations fall prey to.

I hope this helps :)
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many free states existed in 1850 ?
    9·2 answers
  • The Greeks who adopted the mystery religions believed that a defiance of Fate was
    13·2 answers
  • Who was roosevelt's vice president?
    10·1 answer
  • How does relativity impact the USA​
    6·1 answer
  • How was Texas involved in the Mexican fight for independence against the Spanish?
    13·1 answer
  • One reason the 2nd Great Awakening occurred was because
    7·1 answer
  • Laws for the United States are made by
    15·2 answers
  • Statiscal or non statistical????
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the effect of supply and demand on Louisiana current economy
    14·1 answer
  • Have the Puritans had a lasting impact on the american psyche
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!