Answer:
Almost every other business in this universe now relies upon group thinking rather than individual approach to anything.
It has several advantages, some of them are pointed out below:
o) Equality bias, when there are group discussion, this means that everyone has a part of say in the final decision and that leads to equality bias, which is beneficial.
o) More alternatives are generated, it is a fact that when an individual takes a decision, he/she is neglecting a lot of other options to explore which could be a lot beneficial for the business.
o) More acceptance of the final decision, Since the final decision taken is with the approval and consent of everyone, there is a possibility that the final decision will be more acceptable.
o) Lastly, It creates Synergy, synergy is the idea that a decision as a whole is better than in parts.
Hope this helps you. Good Luck.
These are examples of <u>work-related</u> characteristics
Answer: d. more coffee and fewer football tickets
Explanation:
MU/P refers to the marginal utility gained per dollar of an alternative and rationale consumers are always expected to maximise their utility by picking alternatives that give them more utility as opposed to less.
The MU/P for coffee is 20 whilst that of football tickets in 10. This means that more utility is gained from getting more coffee as opposed to football tickets. The action that would maximise utility would therefore be one where the consumer gets more coffee and fewer football tickets.
Answer:
A group is different from a team. The Ringlemann Effect does contribute to the modern day team dynamics.
Explanation:
A group is like an assembly of more than one person who coordinate their individual efforts. They do not have any common purpose to achieve. For example: a group of college students. On the other hand, a team is a group of people who have a common purpose and share a common goal. Like a team of people in office who work on a project.
The Ringelmann effect is the tendency in which productivity of individual members of a group decreases as the size of the group increases. For the development of modern-day team dynamics, the Ringelmann effect's contribution shows that the size of the team should be small so that each individual can contribute enough for the team.
Each team member of a highly effective team is intelligent enough to understand their tasks. They share common goals and achieve them by sharing a few moments of humor as well. They communicate well and have a strong leader.
Some of the barriers to teamwork include bad leadership, poor communication among the members of the team, personal clashes and also when the goal planning is not done adequately.
