It can be inferred that Allen believes the case of flag-burning can be handled just like any other case and all the opinions on the topic are all welcome.
The text evidence is "not treating the flag-burning case like the simple case it is".
It can be inferred that Allen believes the case of flag-burning can be handled just like any other case and all the opinions on the topic are all welcome.
The text evidence is "not treating the flag-burning case like the simple case it is".
Explanation:
Based on the given lines, it can be inferred that Allen shared his opinion and he believes that the specific case could be analyzed in a manner that is similar to those used for other similar cases. This is based on the line in the text as quoted above. The suggestions from everyone on the specific issue can be tabled and considered.
One way to show that a statement is not a good definition is to find a counterexample. A counterexample will show that there are more views on any subject.
