Answer:
Short answer: More power due to theocracy.
An absolute monarch allows the government to control the wealth, status and life of the people. At first this may seem liberating but it could actually be good. Most people that were a monarch ran under a theocracy, they believed to have divine right from God himself. This would make the monarch the most powerful ruler, which means they would get to make decisions. As for the people they could always go to one person and count on one person for the greater good of their country. All decisions would be made by this monarch and the people wouldn't have to go through many. Change relied on changing the opinion of the monarch. If you had a bad monarch you are doomed and the people hate you. If you have a good monarch the people love you and you may thrive due to a better public ethic.
The answer is deficit spending. It is said that it is usually done to fuel the
economy in times of recession. To do so,
one must be careful that it does not lead to a permanent deficit. There are some who are against this because they believe it to be a
bad policy.
Answer:
If another force took the missisippi the USA was afraid they might be taken oevr
Explanation:
All of the following were part of the Populist Party's program except "<span>a. a flat income tax—everyone pays the same rate or percentage," since the Progressives were in favor of a "Progressive Tax" system that would have taxed higher earners more heavily. </span>
Explanation:
can you copy and paste it cause it's hard to read
