Answer:
- Circular reasoning.
Explanation:
A Fallacy is described as a flaw or error in the reasoning of an argument which makes the argument unsound and invalid.
Circular reasoning is characterized as the logical fallacy in which the argument begins with the point through which the author wishes to end/conclude the argument.
The given argument exemplifies 'circular reasoning' as it assumes that 'the actors are conceited' which implies that the point author is trying to prove is already assumed true. <u>This creates a logical error as the conclusion is made without any proof</u>.
The question above wants to assess your ability to argue scientifically. As this skill is something very personal, I can't write this paragraph for you, but I will show you how to write one.
First of all, you should know that the Channels on Mars are evidence that there was once intelligent life on Mars, as these channels look like artificial channels created for the movement of water.
A scientific argument, in turn, refers to an opinion, based on proven scientific facts.
In this case, to write your argument you should:
- Search for articles featuring information and facts about the Channels on Mars.
- Read the articles, evaluate the information presented and create an opinion based on them.
- Write your opinion in a paragraph and show evidence, taken from the articles that prove this opinion.
Remember that despite being an opinion, a scientific argument is a formal text and must be written formally. Also, you must remember to use the words presented in the question above.
More information:
brainly.com/question/17444462?referrer=searchResults
Your question is a bit confusing since i don't know which sentences are which, but it might be this:
Answer: 1.
1. Jax hadn't
2.as far as I'm aware already seen the movie before we went to see it together.
