I believe the answer is cruel
Answer:
Authors reinterpret familiar stories because
Option A. To use shared references that allow the audience to feel more
connected to the story.
Explanation:
Authors refer to familiar stories so that they connect with the audience better. Audience already knows a story and when an author reinterprets that story, audience can better understand his version. They can understand his point of view by use of the shared references of that story which they are aware of.
He doesn't do this to improve the story as per option B. Also, he doesn't use simple dialogue in different languages as Option C. Option D is also incorrect which says that author wants to show advancement of literary and artistic tradition.
The answer would be D. It has a comma, the w is capitalized, and the question mark is inside the quotation marks.
"<span>The link between clear, logical organization and effective communication is powerful, both for the "sender" and the "receiver." For the writer, a well organized outline of information serves as a blue print for action. It provides focus and direction as the writer composes the document, which helps to ensure that the stated purpose is fulfilled. For the reader, clear organization greatly enhances the ease with which one can understand and remember the information being presented. People seek out patterns to help make sense of information. When the reader is not able to find a pattern that makes sense, chaos and confusion abound. Effective communication, then, begins with a clearly organized set of ideas following a logical, consistent pattern. Thus, one of the most important decisions a writer makes concerns the pattern of organization that is used to structure and order information."</span>
