Why is primary sources and secondary sources useful in historical research?

2 answers:

8 0

Primary sources are the historical documents used by historians as evidence. In contrast, a secondary source is the typical history book which may discuss a person, event or other historical topic.

Lelu [443]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

primary sources- are when the person who wrote this was actually there and saw everything happen.

A secondary source- is when the writer is going based off other information .

Explanation:

hope this helps :) and if it does, could i please get brainliest? :))

You might be interested in

Brahmanism gradually changed into Hinduism after the introduction of new beliefs regarding

pishuonlain [190]

Answer: D. reincarnation and enlightenment

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Who wrote the republic in ancient greece?

velikii [3]

The philosopher, Plato, is the author of "The Republic." Around 380 BC.

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is an outcome of Gideon v. Wainwright?

podryga [215]

Can you just look it up

3 0

3 years ago

The goal of the Montgomery bus boycott was to

ankoles [38]

The goal of the Montgomery bus boycott was to raise support to oppose segregation. The correct option among all the options given in the question is option "b". The Montgomery Bus Boycott was actually a peaceful revolt by the people against racial segregation or discrimination in city buses. It was also a way for decreasing the profit of the bus company that believed in racial segregation.

7 0

3 years ago

Why did hitler want to conquer the soviet union?

Hitman42 [59]

The short answer is that the Soviet Union is very rich in natural resources as well as their ideologies are polar opposite.

5 0

3 years ago