3 years ago

Why is primary sources and secondary sources useful in historical research?

2 answers:

8 0

Primary sources are the historical documents used by historians as evidence. In contrast, a secondary source is the typical history book which may discuss a person, event or other historical topic.

Lelu [443]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

primary sources- are when the person who wrote this was actually there and saw everything happen.

A secondary source- is when the writer is going based off other information .

Explanation:

hope this helps :) and if it does, could i please get brainliest? :))

You might be interested in

Explain the European justification for the partitioning of Africa.

inessss [21]

Answer:

Rival ethnic groups forced to live together causing conflicts and wars. Lost many resources without equal return. ... Africans were forced to work on plantations and in mines for very little money.

3 0

3 years ago

In 1832 hey Supreme Court, Georgia did not have legal authority over the Cherokees living in the states. President Andrew Jackso

11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

Answer:

President Andrew Johnson declined to enact the verdict by the supreme court.

Explanation:

The President, Andrew Johnson responded to the decision by the supreme court by declining to enact their decisions. He rather enforced further laws that were against the Cherokees and they were gradually forced out of the land.

7 0

3 years ago

Read the excerpt from "Perseus." [Queen Cassiopeia] had boasted that she was more beautiful than the daughters of Nereus, the Se

omeli [17]

Its modesty i just took the test

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which states felt the most comfortable with the New Jersey Plan

agasfer [191]

Smaller states since they would get as much representation as the Bigger states.

7 0