Decreases it By causing nutrients to wash away Explanation:
<span>Option correct is C. Governors. The Federal Reserve System is a reserve system governed by an autonomous and private entity that controls the organizational structure that is overseen by a government agency, called the Board of Governors, located in Washington D.</span>
Answer:
a. $1508
Explanation:
June 1 150 units
June 10 200 units
June 15 200 units
June 28 150 units
Total 700 units
Out of above, only 210 units are in hand. Under LIFO method, 150 units are from 1st June and 60 units are from 10th June.
Date Units (a) Per unit cost (b) Ending inventory (a*b)
June 1 150 $6.93 (1040/150) $1.040
June 10 60 $7.8 (1560/200) $468
Total 210 $1,508
So, using the LIFO inventory method, the value of the ending inventory on June 30 is $1,508
Answer:
-$2,350
Explanation:
In this question, we have to compare the cost which is shown below:
If we considered the reworked cost, then the sales would be
= Sales - reworked cost
= $55,700 - $1,750
= $53,950
And the scrap value is $56,300
So, the financial disadvantage would be
= Sales without reworked cost - scrap value
= $53,950 - $56,300
= -$2,350
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer and Explanation:
A. Given that Design 1A will cost $1.7 million to build and $175,000 per year to maintain
Given that Design 1B will cost $3.6 million to build and $40,000 per year to maintain
Both designs are assumed to be permanent
To find ROR using AW based rate of return equation, we find present value of each design and equate them:
Each design is permanent so
Present value of perpetuity:
Design 1A= 1700000+175000/r
Design 1B = 3600000+40000/r
=1700000+175000/r=3600000+40000/r
135000/r=1900000
Cross multiply
r=135000/1900000
r= 0.0710
r=7.10%
B Given that ROR=7.10% and MARR is 25%
MARR>ROR
Hence we reject both designs
