The answer is option B. The main challenge of career planning in changing times is that you need to revise your plans often.
The world we live in is dynamic. New inventions, new technology, new methods of doing things always come up with time.
Because of this, when making a career plan, one must be fully aware that the process is not static. That is, changes would occur and as such, you have to revise your plans often so that it is in line with what is obtainable at the time.
<em>Read more on career planning here: brainly.com/question/6457203?referrer=searchResults</em>
Answer:
Instructions are listed below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The sales budget for the year shows 50,600 units and total sales of $2,317,800.
The total unit cost of making one unit of sales is $22.
Selling and administrative expenses are expected to be $304,000.
Income taxes are estimated to be $270,180.
Income statement:
Sales= 2,317,800
COGS= (22*50,600)= (1,113,200)
Gross profit= 1,204,600
Selling and administrative= (304,000)
Tax= (270,180)
Net operating profit= $630,420
Answer:
a. Whataburger is not using the optimal cost-minimizaing mix of cashier and kiosks.
b. Whataburger should hire more cashier and rent fewer kiosks in order to improve its mix of inputs and minimize the cost
Explanation:
a. According to the given data we have the following:
Let "C" is a cashier.
"K" is a kiosk
MPC = 48 (Marginal Product of Cashier)
MPK = 32 (Marginal Product of Kiosk)
PC = $15 (cashier can be hired for a wage of $15)
PK = $12 (Kiosk rents for $12)
At optimal cost minimization point, (MPC / MPK) = (PC / PK)
(MPC / PC) = (MPK / PK)
(MPC / PC) = (48 / 15) = 3.2
(MPK / PK) = (32 / 12) = 2.67
Since the (MPC / PC) and (MPK / PK) is not equal. It implies Whataburger is not using the optimal cost-minimizaing mix of cashier and kiosks.
b. We have to use the following:
(MPC / PC) > (MPK / PK)
i.e., 3.2 > 2.67
It means Whataburger hire more cashier and rent fewer kiosks in order to improve its mix of inputs and minimize the cost.
