Answer:
Joseph Gurney Cannon known as the "Uncle Joe" Cannon who was one of the most powerful speaker of the house in the United State history. He is the second longest continuously serving speaker of the house from Republican party. he had immense control over the house of representatives of United States.Using his power, he could block the file from passing which he didn't like. He was also against of any kind of reform. He wanted America as it was.
With immense power and law, he could control the which file would go on the floor, would be presented for vote as the speaker. He suppressed the law from voting which he didn't support.
On March 17, 1910 after failing two times to curb Cannon's power over the house the Nebraska representative Norris along with 46 progressive republican and entire 149 democrats to revolt against Cannon.On that day some of the most powerful allies of Cannon were absent.
However, Cannon survived but his absolute power over the house decreased.
So the main reason of revolt against Cannon was his absolute use of power, non progressive thinking.
Explanation:
Electoral college!
hope this helps also pls mark brainliest
President Kennedy’s policy of “flexible response” differed from Eisenhower’s New Look Policy in that "<span>(B) it allowed for a response to a wider spectrum of warfare," since the Kennedy Administration believed that the "New Look Policy" was too restricted in its methods of retaliation. </span><span />
Use this link to learn everything you need to know!: https://study.com/academy/lesson/local-state-national-elections-in-the-us.html
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
Potter's Historical Interpretations of the Civil War:
Students of history state that he had a lopsided scholarly history, since he offered a dimension of tolerance to the genius bondage philosophies that he doesn't grant to the abolitionist subjugation development. Abolitionists were everything from oppressive to helpful people, as per Potter.
Holt's Historical Interpretation of the Civil War:
Holt, then again, was a teacher so he given an increasingly clear translation of the Civil War, indeed, Holt sees the contention as a breakdown in America's majority rule political procedure. No longer contrasts must be settled inside the field of fight, as per him.
