Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the one having to do with "revising the will of the past," since activist justices take a stronger role in upending previous decisions. </span>
<u> B. In an authoritarian government, the leaders of the government have absolute power.</u>
An authoritarian government is marked by the concentration of power in a small elite or leaders that exercise power arbitrarily, without limits, and without taking account on any body of law or existing Constitution, usually disrespecting people's right of having fair elections, freedom to express, among others. In opposition to this, in a constitutional government, the leaders' powers are limited. And these leaders are elected, kept in power and limited according to the laws of a given nation or area.
General Lee Prior to the Battle of Gettysburg could have something like the following:
"One more battle and we'll take Washington. This will end this war and guarantee our freedom."
"One more battle to humiliate the Yankee forces. This will be easy."
General Lee after the Battle of Gettysburg could have said something like the following:
"That did not go as planned. If only I had had Stonewall Jackson with me."
"How did it all go wrong? We were supposed to win."
"We must regroup quickly so they do not take advantage of our situation."
Vietcong, SEATO and the US produced weapons