A homeowner fears the construction of a factory nearby will decrease the value of her property. this illustrates the principle of externalities.
Many people are unaware that there are tax advantages for home owners when they purchase, own, remodel and even sell their property. These advantages take the form of tax deductions, which lower your taxable income and hence lower your tax payment.
However, you might be astonished to hear that even though the house was bought with a mortgage, you still own it. As the homeowner, your name is listed on the title. The lender does not actually own your home; rather, they only have a stake in the property and the mortgage note.
According to the Federal Reserve's 2020 Survey of Consumer Finances, if you own your home, you probably have a higher value than someone who rents. The assumption that owning a home is a wise financial decision is supported by the fact that homeowners have a net worth that is more than 40 times bigger than their counterparts who rent.
Learn more about homeowners here:
brainly.com/question/23428348
#SPJ4
Answer:
It has been a well known fact that competitive strategy creates a unique value for a target set of movie customers. However, it is not able to predict nor explain the outcome due to the fact that Marvel only focused on trying to compete to be the best in comic and superhero films which thus resulted in basically a case whereby there was a competition in which one participant wins totally and another loses without gaining any objectives and thus they were not able to win.
Explanation:
This question is taken from a book titled "The Marvel Way: Restoring a Blue Ocean". It was written by W. Chan Kim, Renee Mauborgne, Michael Olenick. The central theme of the book was about one of the greatest turnarounds in modern business history by the then Marvel CEO with the name Peter Cuneo who was responsible for turning the business around and succeeded in launching a blue ocean.
From the question, neither predicts nor explains the outcome because;
It has been a well known fact that competitive strategy creates a unique value for a target set of movie customers. However, it is not able to predict nor explain the outcome due to the fact that Marvel only focused on trying to compete to be the best in comic and superhero films which thus resulted in basically a case whereby there was a competition in which one participant wins totally and another loses without gaining any objectives and thus they were not able to win.
You didn't finish your question, so I cannot know for sure. However, I did manage to find two such questions online - one is asking 1. How was the case settled? and the other one 2. How was Gurado's fraud discovered? Depending on which one is your question, here are the answers:
1. <span>Gurado was terminated and he immediately paid back the money.
2. </span><span>He suspected he was on the verge of being caught, called the company's president, and confessed that he had taken the money.</span>
Given:
Fixed cost = 100
Variable cost = 10 sweaters; 15
Variable cost = 11 sweaters; 17
Total cost of 10 sweaters = $100 + 15 = $115
Total cost of 11 sweaters = $100 + 17 = $117
Change in number of sweaters = 11 - 10 = 1
Change in total cost = $117 - 115 = $2
The marginal cost of the 11th sweater is $2.