Answer:
Explanation:
I hope it helps!
if you need anything more for more informations i got chu!
~ Delilah ~
Answer:
In the First Barbary War, which was started by the United States refusal to pay immunity fees to the North African Barber states, it saw the succesful use of the United States Marines. After the marines stormed the city of Derna, thus giving the US leverage over the Tripolian government, thus seeing the release of all American sailors, and goods, along with the end of the First Barbary War.
The two developments that led to a state of emergency being formally declared in 1965 by the governor of Kenya were:
- Mau Mau attacks on individuals and settlements loyal to Britain.
- failure of a 1950 ban to stop the growth of the Mau Mau Rebellion.
<h3>Why did Kenya see a state of emergency in 1952?</h3>
As anti-colonial sentiment spread across Africa after World War II, Kenya was no different and the Mau Mau organization was one of those that pushed for independence in Kenya.
They went about it violently however by attacking individuals and settlements that were seen as pro-British and therefore had government protection.
This led to a ban in 1950 to stop the growth of the Mau Mau organization. This ban failed however, as the Mau Mau only grew in numbers and popularity.
In the end, the governor had to declare a state of emergency to deal with the Mau Mau Uprising.
Find out more on the Mau Mau rebellion at brainly.com/question/26522309
#SPJ1
Answer:
The root issue for the nullification crisis was:
B States wanted to nullify federal laws that they deemed unconstitutional
Explanation:
The Nullification crisis has its roots in the refusal to collect tariffs between 1828 and 1832 by the state of South Carolina.
"Was _______ a hero or hypocrite?" could be asked about almost any figure in history. Human beings are complicated creatures who live amid conflicting situations. Rarely do you find anyone who is totally consistent in every point of view they hold and every action that they take.
In the case of Thomas Jefferson, the "hero or hypocrite" question tends to focus on his ideals, as expressed in the Declaration of Independence (which he authored), that all people "<span>are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" -- as contrasted with the fact that Jefferson owned hundreds of slaves and fathered several children by Sally Hemings, one of his slaves.
Jefferson indeed was heroic as one of America's founding fathers to set this nation on a course of liberty and justice for all. But slavery was deeply embedded in the colonies and not something easily or quickly undone. Jefferson's slaves were those which he had inherited from his father or acquired by marriage to his wife, Martha (whose family also owned slaves). Jefferson had criticized the British for sponsoring the slave trade. He also led the effort to have the state of Virginia ban the importing of slaves in 1778. Jefferson did have plans for the emancipating of slaves, seen in a bill he proposed as governor of Virginia in 1779, but recommended emancipation as a gradual process due to the complexities of the situation.
So, "hero or hypocrite"? The answer to that is not quick or easy. Jefferson had ideas and plans to address the slavery situation, but recognized the need to proceed gradually in order to make such a transition without great turmoil affecting the new country.</span>
